Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 007
Original file (2013 007.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-007

 

Honorable, M1000.6A, 12.B.16, JND, Separation for Miscellaneous/General
Reasons, RE3

Upgrade RE code
None

None

 

 

 

TIS 6 yrs, 3 months, 16 days
Policy Implications _| None

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant was discharged for separation for miscellaneous/general reasons due to alcohol abuse. The
applicant’s complete Personnel Data Record and Separation Package were available for the Board to review.

The Board also utilized available information contained in electronic records and documents submitted by the
applicant.

The applicant was involved in two alcohol incidents in 2006 that involved simple assault and disorderly
conduct. Both occurrences were documented in which they indicated that alcohol was a causative factor. The

applicant was subsequently granted a Second Chance Waiver to continue serving after the command had
recommended the applicant for discharge.

In the Spring of 2010, the member was counseled on alcohol use due to tardiness in unit activities. In late
2010, while on deployment, it was determined that the applicant urinated in the back of a rental vehicle
procured with government funds. The applicant was then taken to NJP in the Spring of 2011 and recommended

for discharge. The right to an attorney, and to make a statement were afforded; The applicant objected to the
discharge and made a short statement.

The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 048

    Original file (2012 048.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was screened and found to be alcohol abusive and directed to receive Level I outpatient treatment. The Board unanimously recommends no relief and the RE4 is in accordance with policy. No relief.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 048

    Original file (2013 048.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-048 Honorable, COMDTINST M100.6A, ART 12-B-12, JPD, Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, RE4 Upgrade RE code, Change Narrative Reason for Separation Partial relief: Recommend Narrative Reason is amended to: Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure due to receiving two alcohol incidents in 2008- 2009. Therefore, the Board recommends the following...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 016

    Original file (2014 016.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CORRECTIONS TIS 3 yrs, 3 months, 6 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Unsuitability due to Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure in the summer of 2006. On the equity standard, the board referred to ALCOAST 125/10, to make a recommendation on the Narrative Reason (NR) for his separation. The Board notes most or all separations occurring after said ALCOAST to present, only issue a JPD (SPD) code when the member is unable to complete outpatient...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 063

    Original file (2013 063.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant was given an Honorable Discharge and the most favorable Narrative Reason for separation. Administrative change will be made to the correct Separation Authority to COMDTINST M1000.4, Art.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 051

    Original file (2013 051.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECCEN followed up in late 2006 to indicate that no improvement had been made to eliminate the sizable debt that the applicant had created over a significant amount of time. Additionally, the command formally counseled applicant on the need to change their rating for retention in the service. Discharge: No change | 25.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 055

    Original file (2013 055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following provides an outline of the approval process and the notable findings: Applicant’s command: Made separation notification after just 3 months on performance probation. The current application requests to remove the Narrative Reason (NR) as ‘Unacceptable Conduct’, and to amend it to a Voluntary Separation that is in alignment with SPD code KND with an NR of Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons. EPM separation approval (summary): In the summer of 2013, the Discharge was...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 050

    Original file (2013 050.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-050 NAME CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6A, Article 12.B.16, JFX, Personality Disorder, RE4 RELIEF REQUESTED | Upgrade RE code RELIEF GRANTED SPD code: JND Narrative Reason: Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons BY DRB RE code: RE-3H Separation Authority: COMDTINST M1000.4, Article 1.B.12 (legacy Personnel Manual 12.B.12) ADMIN None CORRECTIONS TIS 7 yrs, 6 months, 12 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 018

    Original file (2013 018.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that the DD-214 issued is in error and that the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) does not recognize the “Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons” for 100% entitlement to DVA educational benefits. The applicant has not substantiated any issues with propriety or equity in this case. In the applicant’s case, early release was requested after 32 months of active service.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 051

    Original file (2012 051.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commands shall document all counseling in accordance with Preparation and Submission of Administrative Remarks (CG-3307).” There is no record of the command complying with these requirements prior to recommending the applicant for discharge. Additionally, the absence of a discharge package and supporting documentation regarding notification of the intent to discharge and appropriate due process being followed is problematic. Therefore, the Board recommends that the applicant’s record be...

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 091

    Original file (2012 091.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the year of 2011, the applicant had two documented alcohol incidents and received NJP for the aforementioned UCMJ Articles 92, 107 and 128. As of ALCOAST 125/10, the SPD code of JND is prescribed for individuals with two accumulated alcohol incidents. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.